Built to close the gap between the paperwork and the defence.

The problem we exist for

Buy compliance and technical security separately and you get two versions of the truth. The consultant writes a control that the engineers cannot implement. The testers find something that never reaches the risk register. The client is left to reconcile two documents that were never designed to meet, usually during an audit, usually at the worst moment.

DATADEFENZ sells both halves from one team, mapped to one control set. A finding from a penetration test lands in the risk register. A regulatory obligation resolves to a control someone owns. A single piece of evidence answers every framework that asks for it, instead of being produced four times in four formats.

How we work

Applicability before assessment. We establish what actually binds you before anyone writes a control, because that question changes the cost of the programme more than any other decision in it.

Fixed scope where fixed scope is honest. Most of our work is packaged — you can read the scope, see a sample of the deliverable, and know the price before a sales process starts. Retainers are relationships and are priced as relationships. We do not pretend one is the other.

Evidence-first. Every control we write specifies its evidence, its owner and its collection interval before it is considered done. The gap between implemented and demonstrable is where audits are lost.

What we will not do

We do not publish client names or logos. We do not present sample deliverables as case studies. We do not sell a tool as a solution to a governance problem, and we will tell you when the honest answer is that you do not need us yet.